Each and every one of us
has our own way of thinking and unconsciously we transmit our beliefs through
our actions. We
react a certain way and when we write our opinion carries within. From billboards
to a novel, authors usually write with a purpose. They express their opinion and when they do,
they don't particularly frame some one or something but instead they express
their feeling unconsciously. This is what we call invisible narratives.
Malcolm Gladwell, who in his novel Outliers talks about different
success stories in the American culture, analyzes the importance of practice.
Gladwell conducts research and later analyzes his results. Through out the
novel Gladwell states that after 10,000 hours of practice one has mastered that
particular skill. For example, mastering to play an instrument or programming a computer.
In
my opinion, Gladwell’s purpose for writing The
10,000 Hour Rule chapter, is to prove that people can obtain success and
with practice achieve greatness. Gladwell didn’t frame anyone, he wrote the
novel for society, to encourage those who doubt themselves.
Now,
when stepping out of the ideal circumstances that Gladwell explains in this
novel, it becomes clear that his theory is limited. People are limited in a way
that only those who are fortunate enough to practice will conquer success. Those that can’t manage their time and can’t
meet the 10,000 hours will never achieve their goals.
Gladwell
also explains that successful people like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and The
Beatles were not naturals, they were driven. Because they were driven they
practiced for extensive hours a day and soon they fell in love with practice. Soon
The Beatles were playing in Germany without pay the only thing they were
gaining was time to practice, time to meet that ideal goal. The
Beatles traveled all over Germany and had the opportunity to perform over 1,200
concerts and quickly they met the 10,000 rule.
Gladwell
writes with such enthusiasm and tries to convince the reader that when one is
passionate one can conquer greatness. But the question lays here, can an
ordinary middle class child, with parents that work full time and have several
siblings, have the determination and encouragement to complete the 10,000 rule?
Who
is Gladwell really trying to convince? Gladwell’s theory, in my opinion, has
some flaws. Ordinary people sometimes can’t seem to find time to take their
children to the park or put them to bed because they are exhausted
from work or have other duties. How does Gladwell expect for someone to meet the 10,000 of practice?
Gladwell’s
invisible narrative is clear here. Unconsciously he is encouraging only certain
people. In particular people and children with parents who are economic
stability, parents that can afford expensive private lessons or even purchase
the instrument or proper equipment for their child to being their practice. The
rich folks, those with the time and money to spare, there I said it.
The
10,000 rule only fits a certain population. Gladwell talks about those who were
born in certain eras. For example, Bill Gates, he was born at the right time
and was old enough to live and prosper from the computer revolution. If Bill
Gates was to be born two or three years before the “ideal” era than he would of
missed his opportunity. Here we can see that not only money is vital to your
success but being at the right place at the right time is important. What happens to those
who are never exposed to certain opportunities like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs
because they struggling with staying alive? According to Gladwell, those who miss their opportunity
will not be successful, .
Gladwell
unconsciously marginalized those who are not so lucky; those who lack resource
and have limited network of individuals. Reading Gladwell’s Chapter, The 10,000 Hour Rule, between the lines
is just scratching the surface of the problem. There is a very strong invisible
narrative in the way of Gladwell writes; even though he is analysis results we
can see several flaws in his conclusion. Most of us can’t say we are as
fortunate as Bill Gates or The Beatles but we can succeed, the only thing is
that we will have some detours and rocky roads along the way.
Interesting choice- you analyzed the invisible narratives behind a text designed to expose invisible narratives.
ReplyDeleteFor this blog, you don't have to be overly academic. You have done some great thinking here, but feel free to frame it any way you'd like. No need for an in-depth intro and conclusion.
I agree, you have done some really deep thinking. However, we don't have to be to academic. I like how you explained things real clearly.
ReplyDeleteyeah, i like you paper it was easy to read. i don't think you wrote this freely, you proved to much structure. i agree with your thesis, that this paper only point out white male and discrete other race and gender.
ReplyDelete